|
|
Post by Darren on Nov 22, 2004 3:06:28 GMT -5
Over the past few years real madrid have spent huge amounts of money and of course we all know about Chelski so I want to know, Who has the spent there money the wisest? Florentino Perez or Roman Abramovic? Madrid or Chelski? The Bernebeu or The Bridge? (I'll stop now)
|
|
|
|
Post by Casey Chaos on Nov 22, 2004 7:04:10 GMT -5
have to say chelski. ive neva thought madrid bought well i just think they do the opposite to buying players to beat other teams, i think they buy the best players from clubs to weaken them. liverpool aint been the same since, yet owen aint doing the best form of his life there. beckham aint wot he used to be yet man u r doing worse without him.
|
|
|
|
Post by leeds13 on Nov 23, 2004 5:39:33 GMT -5
chelski have got sum good players but 4 way 2 much money surely ricardo carvalho isnt worth 18million or wateva it was
|
|
|
|
Post by Darren on Nov 23, 2004 6:34:37 GMT -5
no way, hes not a bad player but he aint amazing.
|
|
|
|
Post by Casey Chaos on Nov 23, 2004 20:01:26 GMT -5
only worth half of that but if u have money to burn then pay wotever u want to get the players.
|
|
|
|
Post by Sy on Nov 24, 2004 7:40:37 GMT -5
I don't think Chelsovska have spent amazingly well, the money they have thrown around on one player could see Norwich playing european football next year if they had it, but I think Madrid have spent even worse, the chelsea team I can see on Match of the day working as a unit most of the time even with their stars but madrid is all about big names and buying players with the reputation to sell shirts, they just get the bonus that the players are usually good.
|
|
|
|
Post by Casey Chaos on Nov 24, 2004 7:43:39 GMT -5
it always happens tho, a team gets too much money thrown at them and it justs gets wasted, but if u look at teams wit limited funds they spend more wisely and aint that far off teams wit loadsa money
|
|
